EVs – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com Latest car news and advice blog Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:07:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 https://engineicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/cropped-ME_favicon-1-32x32.png EVs – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com 32 32 Electrics gain ground in used car market as BYD signs auction deal for second hand EVs https://engineicon.com/electrics-gain-ground-in-used-car-market-as-byd-signs-auction-deal-for-second-hand-evs/ Wed, 10 Jun 2026 08:31:23 +0000 https://engineicon.com/electrics-gain-ground-in-used-car-market-as-byd-signs-auction-deal-for-second-hand-evs/

Low-emission vehicles are becoming increasingly popular in Australia’s second-hand car market as motorists strive to conserve fuel.

But hybrid vehicles, rather than electric models, are proving to be in highest demand and the most resistant to price reductions.

The Australian Automotive Dealer Association and AutoGrab revealed the trends on Tuesday in used car sales figures from May, which also showed the automotive market had bounced back from a sales dip in April.

The news comes one week after new hybrid and electric vehicles sales broke records to represent almost half of all new cars sold in Australia during the month.

The latest sales report showed Australian drivers bought 221,323 second-hand vehicles during May – a rise of more than 17,700 cars compared to April.

Standard hybrid vehicles made up one in 10 used cars up to five years of age, while electric and plug-in hybrid models represented six per cent of sales.

The trend towards low-emission cars reflected consumer efforts to avoid petrol and diesel price rises caused by conflict in the Middle East, association chief executive James Voortman said.

“It’s no surprise to see hybrids performing so strongly,” he said.

“With household budgets still under pressure, many consumers are looking for ways to reduce fuel costs and hybrids offer a practical and proven solution.”

Hybrid cars were also the most likely to withstand discounting to secure a sale, the report found, and retained 93.4 per cent of their value.

By contrast, more than half of second-hand petrol and diesel vehicles were discounted before finding a buyer in May, which Mr Voortman said showed consumers were in the driver’s seat.

“The increase in discounting reflects a strong level of competition in the used vehicle market at the moment,” he said.

“Buyers are in a good position to compare options and negotiate on price.”

The report came on the same day BYD Australia revealed it had signed a three-year deal with Pickles to auction its second-hand fleet vehicles.

The agreement was another sign that Australia’s used electric vehicle market had evolved, Pickles motor vehicles general manager Chris Shaw said, and the move would make them accessible to a wider motoring audience

“We’re seeing increased confidence in used electric vehicles from both private buyers and the trade as the market develops, pricing becomes more accessible, and understanding of EV ownership continues to improve,” he said.

AAP

Source link

]]>
$8000 slashed from Hyundai EVs https://engineicon.com/8000-slashed-from-hyundai-evs/ Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:46:15 +0000 https://engineicon.com/8000-slashed-from-hyundai-evs/

HYUNDAI Motor Company Australia (HMCA) has significantly reduced pricing across its Kona Electric and Ioniq 5 model ranges, slashing manufacturer list prices by $8000 as part of a broader push to boost the appeal of its battery-electric vehicle line-up.

 

The revised pricing, effective immediately, sees the Kona Electric range start from $46,000 + ORC while the larger Ioniq 5 now opens at $68,200 + ORC.

 

Pricing of the performance-focused Ioniq 5 N remains unaffected by the changes.

 

The move comes on top of Hyundai’s previously announced End of Financial Year (EOFY) offers covering a range of petrol and hybrid models, as well as finance incentives.

 

A key change to the Kona Electric range is the introduction of a new Elite grade, creating a three-tier line-up that more closely mirrors the structure of the petrol and hybrid Kona family.

 

The revised range now consists of Standard Range, Elite, and Premium variants, broadening customer choice while lowering the entry point to Hyundai’s small electric SUV.

 

Hyundai says the pricing adjustments are accompanied by minor specification revisions across both the Kona Electric and Ioniq 5 line-ups.

 

For the Ioniq 5 range, the Premium N Line variant now receives leather sports seats featuring N logos in place of the previously fitted suede upholstery.

 

The updated Ioniq 5 line-up continues to offer Hyundai’s E-GMP dedicated EV architecture, ultra-fast charging capability and vehicle-to-load functionality, while the lower pricing brings the medium-sized electric SUV closer to key rivals in the increasingly competitive EV segment.

 

The revised Kona Electric and Ioniq 5 ranges are available to order now, with dealer arrivals commencing this month.

 

HMCA chief operating officer Gavin Donaldson said the repositioned pricing strengthened the appeal of the brand’s expanding electrified vehicle portfolio.

 

“With a diverse portfolio spanning light, small, medium and large SUVs, our award-winning EV line-up has never been more appealing, offering even better value and choice to Australian buyers,” he said.

 

The pricing overhaul follows a period of intensifying competition in Australia’s EV market, where manufacturers continue to adjust pricing and specifications in response to growing consumer choice and softer demand conditions.

Source link

]]>
Jeep And Ram’s Owner Partners With Another Chinese Brand To Build EVs In Europe https://engineicon.com/jeep-and-rams-owner-partners-with-another-chinese-brand-to-build-evs-in-europe/ Thu, 21 May 2026 06:59:14 +0000 https://engineicon.com/jeep-and-rams-owner-partners-with-another-chinese-brand-to-build-evs-in-europe/

  • Stellantis will build Dongfeng’s Voyah EVs in France through a new European joint venture.
  • The deal follows Stellantis’ Leapmotor tie-up, which already brings Chinese EV production to Spain.
  • Chinese automakers are turning to European assembly to blunt tariffs and gain a local foothold.

Stellantis, the automotive conglomerate that owns Jeep, Ram, and 12 other car brands, has just announced a joint venture agreement with China’s Dongfeng to build Voyah EVs in one of its European factories. It already has a similar deal with Leapmotor, under which the latter is assembling its vehicles at a Stellantis plant in Spain to bypass import tariffs these vehicles would have faced if they were manufactured in China.

Chinese EVs face an additional import duty of up to 35% in the EU, on top of the existing 10% import tariff. This hasn’t stopped Chinese automakers from bringing their vehicles over and undercutting local competition, but building them locally is an even better deal for the automakers.

The new Dongfeng deal focuses on the Stellantis plant in Rennes, France. It can accommodate up to three production lines and, at its peak, produced 400,000 vehicles per year, but now it only produces the Citroen C5 Aircross, using only a third of its capacity. Dongfeng will also build Peugeot and Jeep vehicles in China as part of the same deal.

Stellantis already knows the playbook through its tie-up with Leapmotor (in which it holds a controlling share). The Chinese manufacturer initially began production of the T03 electric city car in Poland, but production there was halted in March last year, and it now builds the B10 electric crossover at the Stellantis factory in Zaragoza, Spain. 

Reuters says Leapmotor is looking to expand its collaboration with Stellantis and identify which of Stellantis’ European factories have unused production capacity to build its own models. Leapmotor will also be providing the platform and key components for a new Opel electric crossover, making it one of the first European-badged vehicles built on fully Chinese underpinnings.

Other Chinese automakers have also begun efforts to localize production in Europe. BYD is the most famous in this respect with the huge factory it’s building in Hungary. Chery has partnered with Spain’s Ebro to use the former Nissan plant in Barcelona, while Xpeng and GAC have turned to Austria’s Magna Steyr to assemble cars in Europe.



Europe’s tariffs were designed to protect its car industry from cheaper Chinese EVs, but they may end up accelerating a different kind of Chinese expansion. Instead of simply importing finished cars from China, automakers are now looking for factories, partners, and production footholds inside Europe itself.

For Stellantis, this gives underused plants the prospect of more work and potentially gives its European brands access to cheaper, faster-moving EV technology. Chinese automakers need to get around tariffs and find a path into the market. It’s increasingly looking like Europe’s next wave of affordable EVs may not be imported from China. They may be Chinese-engineered cars built in European factories, sometimes wearing badges buyers already know.

Source link

]]>
Tesla dominates fleet choice for EVs, but lack of electric utes a problem https://engineicon.com/tesla-dominates-fleet-choice-for-evs-but-lack-of-electric-utes-a-problem/ Tue, 19 May 2026 06:35:36 +0000 https://engineicon.com/tesla-dominates-fleet-choice-for-evs-but-lack-of-electric-utes-a-problem/

The Tesla Model Y may well be facing a major challenge from the BYD Sealion 7 when it comes to its ranking of best-selling EVs in Australia, but it remains the dominant choice when it comes to fleet owners.

A new report from Origin Energy, the country’s biggest electricity retailer, notes that 27 per cent of the EVs in its leasing and subscription program are Tesla Model Y electric SUVs, more than double the next most popular electric cars, the Kia EV5 and the VW ID.4.

The data is included in a “lessons learned” report delivered as part of the obligations of Origin’s Fleet Electrification program that has been partly funded by the Australian Renewable Energy Agency.

The program aims to deliver 1,000 EVs to the fleet program, but Origin says the transition has been hindered by the lack of good electric ute options.

Source: Origin Energy.

“Passenger vehicle choice is no longer a barrier for most take-home fleets,” Origin writes.”

“Utes are a different story. Despite making up around 22% of new vehicle sales, there’s limited EV ute options, and those that are available cost more than the ICE equivalent and have limited range.”

And it notes that only two new electric utes have entered the Australian market over the past year. (And one electric ute, the Ford F150 Lightning, is no longer available).

As a result, just 5.2 per cent of Origin’s lease and subscription sales over the reporting period were utes – and all of these were the BYD Shark 6 plug-in hybrids.

Ute prices electricUte prices electric
Source: Origin Energy.

Origin says that for most fleet managers, the decision to go electric comes down to cost, and if the total cost of ownership (TCO) isn’t lower than an equivalent ICE vehicle, “it halts most decisions – any emissions benefit is a bonus, not a driver.”

Still, Origin says it is starting to see a shift. “A small but growing number of customers, particularly in carbon-intensive industries like construction, are now treating emissions reduction as equally important as cost when making fleet decisions.”

That it says is being driven by a couple of factors, including Australia’s own efforts to reduce emissions and by pressure from overseas, particularly on the Australian divisions of companies that operate internationally.

The other major observation from Origin was on the clear preference on “take-home” vehicles, given that these qualify for the federal government’s FBT exemptions, while pool cars do not.

“The sales Origin is making are almost entirely concentrated where customers can access the FBT exemption,” it says, adding that charger funding by ARENA has not been sufficient to close the TCO (total cost of ownership) gap on pool vehicles.

That said, the issues around home charging also needed to be resolved, including developing systems that allowed employees to have their home charging costs covered by their employer, in much the same way as occurs with fuel cards.

“Managing public charging remains an admin burden for fleet managers and drivers – multiple apps, cards and expense claims across different networks,” it notes.

“Origin’s had strong uptake on it’s OneCharge solution that helps solve this, by centralising charger activation and billing across six of the major public charging networks, and aggregating costs onto the fleet bill.”

It concludes: “Driver and fleet manager hesitation is real, but manageable – flexible trials, data-driven suitability tools, and hands-on experience all play a role in converting interest into commitment.

Vehicle availability is improving for passenger fleets, but the ute segment remains a significant gap that limits electrification for a large portion of the Australian fleet market.”

Sign up for The Driven’s free daily newsletter and get the latest EV news and analysis delivered straight to your inbox. 

Source link

]]>
China Went All-In on EVs — Now It’s Betting on Gas Again https://engineicon.com/china-went-all-in-on-evs-now-its-betting-on-gas-again/ Fri, 01 May 2026 06:23:30 +0000 https://engineicon.com/china-went-all-in-on-evs-now-its-betting-on-gas-again/

China spent the better part of a decade making the internal combustion engine look obsolete. Government subsidies, aggressive production targets, and a homegrown battery supply chain turned the country into the world’s dominant EV force. China now commands roughly 70 percent of the global EV battery market. So, it’s more than a little surprising that two of its biggest automakers, Geely and Chery, are pouring serious money into making the gasoline engine smarter, cleaner, and more competitive than it has ever been. Both companies are betting that the internal combustion engine still has a decade or more of relevance left in global markets, and they want to own that space before anyone else does.

Autoblog / Leroy Marion

The Efficiency Race Nobody Expected

The numbers coming out of both companies right now are genuinely hard to believe. Geely recently achieved 48.41 percent thermal efficiency with its new i-HEV hybrid system, a figure independently verified by Guinness World Records, alongside a claimed fuel economy of 106 miles per gallon. For context, Toyota’s latest Prius, considered one of the most efficient engines in the world, manages a theoretical 44 percent. Four percentage points may not sound dramatic, but in thermal efficiency terms, that gap is enormous.

Chery is right behind them. Its latest Kunpeng Tianqing engine achieves a claimed peak thermal efficiency of 48.57 percent, reached through a proprietary technology it calls “Dual-Curve Triple Linkage,” making it the highest recorded figure for a mass-produced internal combustion engine in publicly available data. Chery has gone further than just raw efficiency numbers, though. The company is actively arguing that gasoline vehicles need to stop being dumb. Using its Mars StarCore MIND integrated architecture, Chery has worked to bridge the perception, decision-making, and execution capabilities of fuel-powered vehicles, essentially giving ICE cars the kind of intelligence that was previously exclusive to EVs.

Autoblog / Leroy Marion


View the 2 images of this gallery on the
original article

What This Means for the Rest of the World

The timing of this ICE resurgence is not accidental. As EV penetration in China’s domestic market surpasses 50 percent, global data tells a different story: most of the world still drives on gasoline. Chinese automakers are building for that reality. Exports have become a lifeline for many Chinese brands as brutal domestic competition cuts margins at home. Highly efficient hybrids are a smarter export product than pure EVs in many markets.

The US remains largely walled off. But that does not mean US consumers are insulated from what is happening. Geely has confirmed that its Zeekr and Lynk and Co brands could enter the US within the next three years, potentially produced at the Volvo factory in South Carolina, which is currently undergoing a $1.3 billion expansion. Meanwhile, Chinese automakers have rerouted strategies through local manufacturing in Europe and emerging markets.

Lynk & Co.

The deeper point is this: China did not abandon its EV ambitions. It is running both tracks simultaneously, pushing EVs abroad while quietly perfecting the combustion engine for the markets that are not ready to let it go. That dual strategy, backed by R&D firepower that Western manufacturers are struggling to match, is what makes the current moment genuinely significant. The internal combustion engine may not be coming back, but it isn’t finished either. China is just making sure it has a say in how the final chapter gets written.

Source link

]]>
Ford CEO Jim Farley Talks EVs, Off-Roaders, and More https://engineicon.com/ford-ceo-jim-farley-talks-evs-off-roaders-and-more/ Thu, 30 Apr 2026 02:24:50 +0000 https://engineicon.com/ford-ceo-jim-farley-talks-evs-off-roaders-and-more/

From the March/April 2026 issue of Car and Driver.

Ford Motor Company CEO Jim Farley recently marked his fifth anniversary in the Blue Oval’s top job. Lately, he’s been criticized, as has the leadership at many legacy carmakers, for his company’s money-losing electrification drive, capped recently by the cancellation of the F-150 Lightning, the dissolution of two initiatives with Korean battery makers, and a $19.5 billion write-down related to business-plan changes. A new, more modern EV platform—representing a “Model T moment” for Ford, according to Farley—is set to debut as a mid-size pickup in 2027, built in a retooled Kentucky plant. While it points toward the next steps in Ford’s effort to catch up with the EV industry’s front-runners, which include many Chinese companies, questions remain. How did Ford get to this point? What needs to change? And, in an industry experiencing as much flux as it ever has, can Ford catch up? The 63-year-old executive sat down with Car and Driver contributing editor Jamie Kitman to discuss what’s gone wrong, what’s gone right, the challenges ahead, and cars.

Car and Driver: Let’s start at the beginning. What’s a memory of the automotive world that stands out from your childhood?

Jim Farley: When we moved to Greenwich, Connecticut, the Chinetti building [headquarters of North American Ferrari distributor Luigi Chinetti] was right on the Post Road. After I was done with my paper route, I’d ride over on my Schwinn. On Saturday, I would spend pretty much the whole day with the Italian mechanics in the basement of that building. And [Chinetti] had all his old NART racing cars. We would go through each one, and the mechanics would joke about the customers and talk about racing these cars all around America.

I saw you smoke the field at Laguna Seca in your Cobra last summer. Previously, you told me the thing about racing that you like is that when you’re really challenged and it’s scary, that actually makes you better.

Yes. I love racing. But I love racing because I like competing. I don’t like racing because it makes noise or something. I have a philosophy of putting yourself in as many awkward situations as possible and growing through your overwhelming situation. So, I really believe in survival, developing in a tough situation.

You are more of a car guy than a lot of executives.

I love working on cars, and I love cars, but that’s not my job anymore. People think, “Oh, you’re like Bob Lutz.” I’m actually not like that [head product role]. I’m quite different than that. What I’m passionate about is the sustainability of the company and using this moment of software-defined vehicles and the revolution of lower-CO2 powertrains to make Ford stronger.

And all I really care about is fixing our quality and our safety and our cost, and making it a safe place to work in all definitions of safety, and to have a great future and a great business, so we could do more social good as well, like my grandfather, but also return lots of rewards to our shareholders.

two individuals engaged in a conversation in a dimly lit room

Roy Ritchie|Car and Driver

The F-150 Lightning seemed to be selling well at first, but after you’d expanded to meet higher-than-anticipated demand, it didn’t go as planned. Looking back at the Lightning, would you do it differently?

I totally would’ve done it differently. I mean, look, we didn’t know what we didn’t know.

For me, it’s hard to escape the fact that COVID’s effect on car sales was record profitability, as limited numbers of silicon chips were diverted to the most expensive vehicles, which sold remarkably well, perhaps faking out a generation of product planners. Because ultimately, there’s a limit to how much people can afford to pay.

COVID totally was a false signal. Post-COVID, and during the chip crisis that was a result of it, there was such high demand for all vehicles. If you could build a vehicle, you were going to sell it basically at 30 or 40 percent higher prices than before COVID. And I guess it didn’t take us long to learn that our internal-combustion-engine prejudice was so high that we hadn’t designed the [electric] cars right. We had a Mustang [Mach-E], we had an E-Transit, we had a Lightning, and people loved these products. The problem was they were never going to pay the cost we put into the vehicle.

When did you realize you’d done EVs wrong?

When we ripped apart a Tesla with Doug Field [Ford’s chief officer for EVs, digital, and design, formerly of Apple and Tesla]. I was just absolutely flabbergasted. The Mach-E’s wiring harness was 70 pounds heavier and 1.6 kilometers longer. We didn’t know what was going on in [Tesla engineers’ ] minds. But now we understand. They had no prejudice. We had prejudice. We’d gone to our supply-chain person and said, “Buy another wiring harness.” [Tesla] said, “Let’s design the vehicle for the lowest, smallest battery.” Totally different approach.

The Raptor lineup has done pretty well for itself.

I’d say that the biggest surprise of Ford is the off-road stuff.

I just never expected that it would turn into such a profitable, expansive brand image for us. Between the Bronco, the Raptors, and the Tremors, we can’t make enough of the stuff around the world.

But not for Europe.

We haven’t really tried in Europe. Europe for us has always been kind of a wildly independent group at Ford. I ran that business for a while. I think the first year I was there, we lost $1.8 billion. I think we made that much four years later, but we had to restructure, close plants, rationalize. It’s been difficult. And now Europe probably is one of the most difficult markets in the world, because the Chinese have come, and they’ve hidden behind local brands like MG or Polestar and Volvo. And the rules for CO2 are so strict in Europe and the U.K. If you want to drive into the city center and not have to pay 50 bucks every time you go in, you have to get an electric vehicle.

“I love working on cars, and I love cars, but that’s not my job anymore. People think, ‘Oh, you’re like Bob Lutz.’ I’m actually not like that. I’m quite different than that.”

You’ve launched an electric in Europe recently, the Puma Gen-E. How is it doing?

It’s doing well. I think it’s the number one EV in the U.K. now. It qualifies for an incentive, so it’s super affordable. And for the last few years, the Puma [including the gas version] has been the bestselling vehicle in the U.K

If you were to try to sell it in the United States, what do you think would happen?

Too expensive, too small, I think. You and I would love it. The question is, would it be like the Flex, where the people who owned it loved it, but there just weren’t enough of them?

I know a few Flexes. I loved them. And the Fiesta ST.

Probably one of the best cars we’ve ever made. They were amazing.

Despite a Ford lineup that is very truck-forward, you’ve spoken out on the need for Americans to get used to driving smaller, lighter cars.

I feel like we could probably do a better job in America at having more diverse sizes. Americans once appreciated different kinds of cars more than they do today.

I don’t want to just let the Corolla and the Civic and the Hyundai and Kia products dominate the middle of the market. But I believe the best chance for us to do that is to apply our innovation to the future segments like EVs, because I believe that would give us the best chance to improve our fitness to compete, when everyone is going through the same learning curve. We have great hybrid technology. Our domestic competitors don’t. We could come out with a great Civic competitor. But then when I look at that strategically, I’m like, is that going to help me beat the Chinese OEMs or even match them?

If I look around that corner, it’s BYD, Great Wall, Geely. Hyundai, Kia. Where are they going? Well, they’re putting the best people on these partial- or fully electric vehicles that are low cost. That’s where they’re putting the best people. That’s where I’m putting my best people.

car week in monterey for civic.

Roy Ritchie|Car and Driver

Farley won his class in his 1964 Shelby Cobra at last year’s Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion. “I love racing because I like competing,” he says.

The Chinese EV makers seem like the ultimate threat now. How’d the world miss their auto industry’s great leap forward?

Anyone in the auto industry who didn’t feel like something was going to happen in China five years ago was fooling themselves. Certainly, I felt that way. But did we know that the companies and the local brands would get that good that fast? No way.

We couldn’t travel during COVID. We didn’t go to China during COVID. So, it was invisible to us. But I remember going right after with our vice chair, John Lawler. We both looked at each other after about an hour, and we were like, “Holy shit, what the hell happened?” Their cars went from clearly behind us to ahead of us. Designs were beautiful. They were electric cars. Nio had battery swapping. It was just shocking, frankly.

The local OEMs, with massive support from the Chinese government, built themselves into power house brands. A lot of people say now, “Well, BYD is more successful in volume than Tesla,” and they may think that’s, like, a recent phenomenon. But BYD has been making electric vehicles for 20 years.

We’ve talked about the importance of people. The experience of developing the Mustang GTD brought you into contact with a lot of new people. Could you expand on that?

Today, we have this technological revolution of software-defined vehicles and partially and fully electric powertrains. Those two innovations require completely new know-how. And so, at this particular time, the racing and the production worlds collide. The racing world is always dependent not just on good businesspeople like Roger Penske but also on the Larry Holts [a Multimatic executive whose fingerprints are all over the GTD] and innovators who do the technology side of racing. It’s very similar to the Doug Fields and Alan Clarkes [Ford’s executive director of advanced EV development] and people who came from Formula 1 and Tesla who had no formal training in traditional auto engineering, supply chain, or manufacturing.

These types of talented people are also bringing the innovation that is required to compete against China. And there’s no playbook. You can’t go and look up, “Hey, how do I do an EREV [extended-range electric vehicle], which has a 100- to 150-mile battery with a small engine to charge the battery? How do you know how big the engine should be? How do you know how big the battery should be? What chemistry should the battery be? For electric architectures, do you have four-zone electric architectures? Should we develop the AI chip inside the company, or should we delegate to someone else? Use the off-the-shelf Nvidia chip, or do we do something custom?” These are all insane line items. All of these choices have to be informed by people who understand the technology and can visualize whether it’s going to work or not. And so, strangely enough, I find there’s a lot of synergy between development excellence in motor sports and a big company like Ford going through these changes.

Historically, Ford has been known to be a very political company with lots of fiefdoms. And I guess one reason why former Ford CEO Alan Mulally was successful and celebrated was because he somehow was able to tamp that down. I’ve heard anecdotally that a lot of that began returning the minute he left the building, and it soon became time to tamp it down again. How have you addressed that?

I think it was one of the reluctance factors for me to join Ford. But when I met Alan and [executive chair] Bill [Ford Jr.], I was pretty convinced this place had a chance of changing. As an American, I didn’t want to be sitting over there at Toyota after watching my grandfather [one of Henry Ford’s earliest line workers] and all his neighbors, and my mom’s neighbors, growing up, suffer so much because of our success at Toyota [where Farley spent 17 years before coming to Ford]. I was like, “Yeah, I gotta do something.”

I remember coming into the executive garage—now, at Toyota, we had no executive garage—on my first day at Ford [in 2007]. I was surprised there were no Fords; they were all Range Rovers and Volvos. Alan saw the same thing. I was like, “I thought I was going to Ford.” And then, an executive came out of the elevator. I went over and said, “My name is Jim Farley.” And he goes, “I know who you are. We don’t need any help from Toyota.” And I said, “How’s that working for you?”

But as soon as the ’08 [financial] crisis happened, there were no politics at Ford. During COVID, when we were making ventilators, there were no politics at Ford. It seems like that [corrosive internal politics] only happens when we’re kind of in stasis. Not when you’re in complete challenge mode.

detroit january 5: jim farley, scion vice president, poses with the new tc sports coupe at the north american international auto show january 5, 2004 in detroit, michigan. the show, which will feature more than 700 vehicles, opens to the public january 10. (photo by bill pugliano/getty images)

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Before joining Ford, Farley spent 17 years at Toyota, where he led the launch of the Scion brand.

You’ve spoken about a shortage of trained factory workers. What are some other big challenges today?

I don’t think we can afford as a country to not make manufacturing-grade semiconductors. If we don’t reshore from Taiwan and China, and we have any kind of global problem, as we found out during COVID, we can’t make anything. I think that the Trump administration and government leaders on both sides of the aisle now have had an “aha!” moment. As have companies like ours and leaders like me, who said, “Hey, Wall Street just wants a cheaper car. They want us to make more money.” But at some point, there’s an invisible line, where you outsource so much that you actually don’t have any independence anymore. That’s where we are now.

That raises the matter of government’s role generally. It’s been quite the whipsaw lately.

There have been three mega trends in the government space. I’ll do them in order of significance for Ford.

The first is the massive relaxation of the emissions standards. Huge change. In my 40 years in the industry, I have never been able to sell exactly what customers want. My whole career was marked by CARB and the EPA and the fuel-economy standards. So that’s a huge change, the biggest for Ford. But what it really means is if there are no regulations, then every OEM is going to go back to their cultural norm. At Ford, our cultural norm is to think for ourselves. So, we will offer people pure EVs, even though maybe that’s not the most profitable answer. We will offer EREVs and hybrids when others just say, “We don’t need to spend the money on that stuff.”

The second big policy area is certainly the tariffs. Ford is an unusual situation. Around 80 percent of our vehicles sold here in the U.S. are made here. My competitors—Toyota, GM, others— are like 50 to 60 [percent]. They have big plants in Japan and South Korea; we don’t. But we also imported a lot of parts from overseas to make our U.S.-assembled vehicles affordable. Well, that gave us this huge tariff bill, even though we made most of our vehicles here. Counterintuitively, Ford had one of the biggest tariff bills. So, we worked with the president to try to minimize that, and our tariff bill is about a billion dollars now [for 2025]. It was like three to four [billion, according to earlier projections]. That’s 40 percent of our profit gone. But now it’s about 10 percent.

The third area is definitely going to be: How do we deal with China? China is the most advantaged of all the locations. They have the most subsidies from the government, plus their OEMs are really good.

Once upon a time, Ford built airplanes and television sets, and General Motors built buses and locomotives. In general, car companies seemed to be a lot more ambitious then. All of that’s gone out the window. What are your thoughts on why that is and whether it could change?

I think it’s about to change more than people expect. As you redefine a software-defined product, with different levels of electrification, it turns out the electric architecture we’re building for our vehicles isn’t so different than electric architecture for a drone, isn’t so different than the electric architecture for VTOL [vertical takeoff and landing aircraft]. It also turns out that as we start building batteries and getting closer to tech, we can build batteries, just like we built ventilators in COVID or bombers in World War II. And some of these adjacencies are very attractive businesses, number one.

washington, dc december 03: ford ceo jim farley (c) speaks to u.s. president donald trump as trump makes an announcement on changes to the country's fuel economy standards in the oval office at the white house on december 03, 2025 in washington, dc. joined by executives from major automobile makers, trump announced weaker fuel efficiency standards as part of his agenda to lower the price of gasoline powered cars and dismantle former president joe biden's policies that promoted electric vehicles. (photo by chip somodevilla/getty images)

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

More recently, Farley has worked to mitigate negative effects of the Trump administration’s policy changes.

Number two, for literally the survival of the company or for our emerging out of this wormhole as a vibrant company, those are capabilities that will be essential for the next inning. And so, for a variety of reasons—both of necessity for capability building and so your business is less cyclical or cyclical in a different way than your traditional vehicle business—I think those adjacencies are getting more attractive by the day for companies like Ford.

As an American, I didn’t want to be sitting over there at Toyota after watching my grandfather and all his neighbors, and my mom’s neighbors, suffer so much because of our success at Toyota. I was like, ‘Yeah, I gotta do something.’

Between electrification and autonomous vehicles, the world has certainly changed.

The ride, the drives are changing. When I grew up, my whole experience in the industry was a customer would get in the vehicle and use the vehicle to drive. It’s kind of like a phone— smartphones came along, and now we don’t really use our phone to talk. Most of the time, we’re using it for other things.

Well, the drives are changing now. We have to think more and more about how our vehicle is a third space, an entertainment space. Now that you [can] drive on the highway and have 45 minutes free, what are you going to do in your car? Is it enough to have videoconferencing and consume content you would at home? Or do we need to change the drive to do something more?

Everyone thinks these three things—China, software, and EVs—they’re all the same. No, they’re not the same. The software thing is 10 times bigger to me.

I always say, I think Henry Ford would’ve been insanely bored over the last hundred years at Ford. He would’ve gone in the airplane business or SpaceX or whatever. But if he came back to the company now, he’d be up all night. He’d be writing us notes. He’d be working on the next EREV before our team was. Because I think as a founder, he was a tinkerer. He liked that transformational moment. We’re in that right now.

Headshot of Jamie Kitman

Jamie Kitman is a lawyer, long-time rock band manager, ret’d (They Might Be Giants, Violent Femmes, Meat Puppets, OK Go, The La’s, Pere Ubu, among his clients), and veteran automotive journalist whose work has appeared in publications including Automobile Magazine, Road & Track, Autoweek, Jalopnik, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Politico, The Nation, Harper’s, and Vanity Fair as well as England’s Car, Top Gear, Guardian, Private Eye, and The Road Rat. Winner of a National Magazine Award for his column in Automobile Magazine and the IRE Medal for Investigative Magazine Journalism for his reporting on the history of leaded gasoline, in his copious spare time he runs a picture-car company, Octane Film Cars, which has supplied cars to TV shows including The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, The Americans, Halston, and The Deuce and movies including Respect, The Post, and The Irishman. A judge on the concours circuit, he has his own collection with a “friend of the friendless” theme that includes less-than-concours examples of the Mk 1 Lotus-Ford Cortina, Hillman Imp, and Lancia Fulvia, as well as more Peugeots than he is willing to publicly disclose.

Source link

]]>
EVs Barely Lose Range Even After Five Years: Report https://engineicon.com/evs-barely-lose-range-even-after-five-years-report/ Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:47:30 +0000 https://engineicon.com/evs-barely-lose-range-even-after-five-years-report/

  • The vast majority of electric vehicles are holding on to their original range even after years of driving, according to a new report.
  • Even after three to five years, the range retention on modern battery-powered cars is impressive.
  • Automakers have started including buffers to minimize perceived degradation.

Electric vehicles are holding on to their range far better than many buyers expect, and now fresh data from more than a billion miles of real-world driving is backing that up in a new way. In addition to constantly improving battery technology, automakers are also using software to keep the driving range more consistent over a period of time.

EV analytics firm Recurrent said in a report on Thursday that most EVs on the market lose very little usable range in their first several years on the road. The average EV now retains 97% of its range after three years of ownership and 95% after five years on the road. Put simply, an EV with 300 miles of range when new should still deliver 291 miles after three years and 285 miles after five, according to Recurrent.




InsideEVs' 2026 Breakthrough EV Of The Year: The Nissan Leaf

Photo by: Patrick George

Range anxiety has long been one of the biggest barriers for EV buyers, even though there’s now a robust number of EVs on sale today across segments with at least 300 miles of EPA range. Many new EVs in premium segments are pushing over 400 and even 500 miles of range. However, it’s not always about how far a car can go when new. The other question is what happens after a few years of ownership. 

That’s where the new data helps cut through the noise. Strong range retention can support resale values, make used EVs less risky, and give buyers more confidence that they are not settling for something subpar compared to combustion vehicles. 

Our weekly newsletter digs deep into the biggest EV news every Friday



Recurrent used historical data to come to this conclusion. About 68% of model year 2023 EVs are still exceeding their EPA range today, the firm said. However, it is using a slightly different metric called Expected Range, derived from real-world driving data that factors in things like climate, driving conditions, and battery age. It also projected that a model year 2026 EV with 325 miles of range, for example, will still deliver 301 miles of range in 2031.

According to the report, EV brands with no significant range loss after five years of ownership include Cadillac, Ford, Hyundai, Mercedes-Benz, and Rivian. 

There are a bunch of reasons why this is happening. Automakers are able to minimize range loss over the years by releasing reserve battery capacity and tuning range algorithms with over-the-air software updates as the vehicles age, Recurrent said. Many include a “buffer” of unused cell capacity early on, which allows the car to automatically unlock that capacity later on to erase the effects of degradation.




2026 Lucid Air

Photo by: Lucid Motors

But that’s not it. Automakers and battery companies have been laser-focused on improving the underlying battery tech. Batteries now get a higher energy density, translating to more miles from a similar-sized pack. Things like a cell-to-pack design reduces weight, so more of the car’s floor can store energy. Add to that sophisticated thermal management systems, aerodynamic improvements, and the gains are happening without needing dramatically bigger packs or different chemistries.

In fact, InsideEVs’ own analysis projects that the U.S. will have over 60 EVs with over 300 miles of range by the end of this year, up from 43 last year and 35 the year before. Of course, driving range largely varies across models and segments and continues to be impacted by the weather, driving styles, and road conditions. But with the U.S. public charging infrastructure also growing quickly, range anxiety is increasingly becoming a problem of the past. 

Contact the author: suvrat.kothari@insideevs.com

Source link

]]>
Hyundai says EVs now 20 pct of Australian orders as electric interest surges https://engineicon.com/hyundai-says-evs-now-20-pct-of-australian-orders-as-electric-interest-surges/ Sun, 19 Apr 2026 02:24:04 +0000 https://engineicon.com/hyundai-says-evs-now-20-pct-of-australian-orders-as-electric-interest-surges/

South Korea car giant Hyundai says it has experienced a massive surge in interest in electric vehicles, which now account for 20 per cent of its order volume, up from 3 per cent before the fuel supply crisis emerged after the breakout of the latest Middle East war.

The company says it has seen a more than four-fold increase in EV orders in March – up to 1,037 from 228 in February – with the Kona EV and the newly released Elexio leading the way.

“EVs now account for 20% of our volume – previously we were at less than 3%,” said Hyundai Motor Company Australia director of sales, David Rodda. “We are planning for a 70% increase in EV orders for the second quarter over Q1.”

Rodda says Hyundai Australia has  secured a 158% supply increase of EVs for quarter two to meet this unprecedented level of demand, and these vehicles will start to arrive from May. It is confident the increased supply can continue for the rest of the year.

Hyundai says it has a supply of 1,226 Kona EVs for the second quarter, up from 305 in the March quarter, and also has 1,180 of the new Elexio EVs, up from 750 in the first quarter. Wait times are several months.

It is also increasing its supply of the small Inster (to 255 from 84), and the Ioniq 5 (to 150 from 96). It says the order level in March and April is triple the level of January and February for the Kona, Inster and Ioniq 5, and more than 10-fold for the Elexio.

Table: Hyundai Australia

Hyundai also provided this week by week data of its order numbers, showing the surge in interest in the 3rd and 4th week of March.

Hyundai says it expects to boost order with the release of the Ioniq 3 hatch early next year and the Staria commercial van later this year. It is also seeing a strong interest in hybrid orders, which rose to 3,966 in March from 3,049 in February, and accounted for a record 57 per cent of total orders in March.

See The Driven’s detailed EV sales data here: Australian electric vehicle sales by month in 2026; by model and by brand

Sign up for The Driven’s free daily newsletter by going to the button on the bottom right of the website’s home page at www.thedriven.io

Source link

]]>
One Of The Coolest Retro EVs Gets A New Feature That Makes It Even Cooler https://engineicon.com/one-of-the-coolest-retro-evs-gets-a-new-feature-that-makes-it-even-cooler/ Sat, 18 Apr 2026 02:15:26 +0000 https://engineicon.com/one-of-the-coolest-retro-evs-gets-a-new-feature-that-makes-it-even-cooler/

  • The funky, retro-looking Renault 4 electric crossover is getting a new feature that harks back to the original.
  • The addition is part of a minor technical upgrade that comes just one year after the car went on sale in Europe.
  • New stuff includes a water-to-water heat exchanger that can significantly reduce charging times in freezing weather.

The Renault 4 is one of the happiest EVs out there, with its unashamedly retro looks that hark back to the original do-it-all hatchback of the 1960s. And now, the French automaker is giving the Renault 4 EV a new feature that makes it even cooler–literally and figuratively.

Just like its predecessor, the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric can now be specced with a retractable fabric roof that transforms the battery-powered hatchback into a cut-price convertible at the push of a button. Renault has even launched a special trim called Plein Sud, which means “due south,” that is obviously inspired by the historic Renault 4’s Plein Air variant that was offered in Europe in the late 1960s.

That said, the Plein Air didn’t have doors, a roof, or a tailgate, while the electric Plein Sud has to settle for a more toned-down approach. (Blame those pesky safety regulations, I guess.) If buying a special edition car just for a soft top isn’t your cup of tea, then you should know that Renault also offers the retractable roof on the regular versions of the R4 EV, too, except for the entry-level trim.

The roof’s opening is 36 inches (92 centimeters) long and 31 in (80 cm) wide, and it increases the headroom for the driver and front passenger. However, because the mechanism itself takes up extra space compared to the fixed-roof car, rear passengers get roughly 1.5 in (4 cm) less headroom.

Renault says the roof can be partially or completely opened, and that the load-bearing parts are made of plastic to save weight.



Besides the new soft top, every new Renault 4 sold in Europe gets a revised driver monitoring system that detects fatigue and distraction, and will brake to a standstill if needed. A new water-to-water heat exchanger is also part of the pack, which is said to significantly reduce charging times at freezing temperatures.

Source link

]]>
Europe’s EV Market Is Doing Great. I Think These 4 European EVs Would Do Well In America https://engineicon.com/europes-ev-market-is-doing-great-i-think-these-4-european-evs-would-do-well-in-america/ Mon, 06 Apr 2026 01:20:56 +0000 https://engineicon.com/europes-ev-market-is-doing-great-i-think-these-4-european-evs-would-do-well-in-america/

America’s electric car market is not very hot right now, with experts estimating that sales in this year’s first quarter dropped by 28%. It wasn’t great last year, either, with a 2% decrease, thanks in no small part to the cancellation of the $7,500 federal tax credit.

Meanwhile, Europe is seeing a huge uptick in electric car sales. Last year, numbers went up by nearly 30%, and the first months of 2026 gave no sign of slowing down. I can’t help but wonder: Could some of the best EVs in Europe make a difference if they were sold stateside?

Canada is preparing to open the floodgates to Chinese-made EVs, which are bound to stir some controversy. But you won’t see any of those in the U.S. Still, European companies have plenty of EVs that I think could do pretty well in America—as long as they are priced right. (I think we can all agree that nobody wants another Volvo EX30 story.)




Cupra Born (2026)

Photo by: Cupra

Cupra Born

  • Price in Europe: from €40,450 ($46,700)
  • Range: from 428 km (266 miles) WLTP

Cupra, one of the many brands under the Volkswagen Group’s umbrella, seemed prepared to land in the United States, but that plan has been put on the back burner for now, seeing how the car market there isn’t exactly stable.

If the brand were to come stateside, the Born four-door electric hatchback would take on rivals such as the Nissan Leaf and Chevrolet Bolt EV. Cupra’s compact offering is based on the same underpinnings as the Volkswagen ID.3, which was once hailed as the electric alternative to the iconic Golf.



The difference between the ID.3 and Born is that the latter is much more fun to drive, thanks to a revised chassis setup and its rear-wheel drive powertrain. You might have to explain to your friends what car you’re driving more than once, but if you don’t want a boring commuter car, this would be great.

The base trim gets 204 horsepower, while the sporty spec goes up to 326 hp.




Fiat Grande Panda EV with integrated charging cable

Photo by: Fiat

Fiat Grande Panda

  • Price in Europe: from €24,990 ($28,900)
  • Range: from 320 km (199  miles) WLTP

Fiat’s U.S. portfolio only includes the electric 500e, which is quite the fashionable urban runabout. But it’s expensive and cramped inside. The new Grande Panda EV would right both of these wrongs, with a bigger—albeit more stripped down—cabin and a lower price tag.

Mind you, this is still a small car, but at least it has four doors. Plus, it’s one of the most unpretentious EVs out there, with a no-nonsense attitude. It even has a built-in Level 2 charging cable tucked in the nose. Plus it has chunky styling that gives it a better presence than city cars that failed to take off in the U.S. 




Renault 5 E-Tech

Photo by: Andrei Nedelea

Renault 5

  • Price in Europe: from €28,000 ($32,350)
  • Range: from 312 km (194  miles) WLTP

Remember the Le Car? Probably not, but I’m here to help. It was Renault’s attempt at selling the original Renault 5 in the United States. Suffice to say, it didn’t go well, but the good news is that there’s a brand-new Renault 5 in Europe.

It’s only available as an electric car, and it’s a fantastic one at that. It looks great, it drives nicely, and it doesn’t break the bank. Plus, you can get a baguette holder as an official accessory. Again, small hatchbacks haven’t exactly been popular in the U.S. historically. But come on, look at this thing. 




2025 Volkswagen ID.7

Volkswagen ID.7

  • Price in Europe: from €54,505 ($62,900)
  • Range: from 599 km (372 miles) WLTP

The Volkswagen ID.7 is the only car on this list that had a real chance of being sold stateside before the German automaker changed its mind and pulled the plug, citing “the ongoing challenging EV climate.”

Positioned as the all-electric alternative to the Passat sedan, the ID.7 is a very smooth road-tripping machine, as our former editor-in-chief found out after driving the battery-powered sedan on Germany’s Autobahn. And now that the Tesla Model S is out of the picture, the ID.7 would make for a great alternative. There’s also a wagon version, which I have personally shortlisted for my next car purchase.

Source link

]]>