Mazda – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com Latest car news and advice blog Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:07:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 https://engineicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/cropped-ME_favicon-1-32x32.png Mazda – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com 32 32 Mazda on Touchscreens, Stellantis’ Ram Focus, and a Waymo Recall https://engineicon.com/mazda-on-touchscreens-stellantis-ram-focus-and-a-waymo-recall/ Thu, 18 Jun 2026 14:40:50 +0000 https://engineicon.com/mazda-on-touchscreens-stellantis-ram-focus-and-a-waymo-recall/

Good morning. Welcome to The Downshift, or TDS for short, The Drive‘s morning news roundup that gathers all the largest automotive stories from around the globe and places them in one spot.

Here’s a distillation of what’s bubbling accompanied by links for full stories for those seeking more information as we shift into Thursday, June 18, 2026.

🔊 The latest episode of The DrivecastThe Drive’s new weekly podcast, is now live on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever you get your podcasts.

📱 Mazda, the automaker that swore up and down touchscreens were dangerous and distracting while buttons were safer, has changed its tune; the Japanese automaker’s program manager for the CX-5, Koichiro Yamaguchi, said, “Air conditioning, you can operate with a finger, and if we have to put the physical button, that will be at the lower position. Then the driver has to look down, and [there are] 15 similar looking switches. That means that you rather have to look down and select the correct button—actually, requires the driver [to take eyes] off the road. So rather than that, it’s better to have this control on the screen—minimize this change [distraction].”

🐏 Ram is aiming for 60% sales growth by 2030 as part of Stellantis’ turnaround efforts; this would have the truck maker top Jeep as the company’s volume leader in North America and become its most important brand.

🇺🇸 Jaguar Land Rover is reportedly looking at building vehicles at U.S.-based Stellantis factories including a U.S.-focused Defender to avoid import tariffs.

🇺🇸 Ford’s latest Super Duty debut features a Proud to Honor Package that is a rolling tribute to America if America was a stick-on graphics package.

🐴 Ferrari, shocking no one, is reportedly nudging its clients to buy the Luce EV if they want to move up and make the wait lists for its more exclusive gas-powered models.

🔋 The Jeep Recon’s EPA rating surfaced as 222 miles of range per charge; shocking no one, it appears the Recon will not be efficient, or have impressive range, despite its large 100-kWh battery pack.

🔌 Telo’s tiny electric truck is going to have the ability to charge surprisingly fast thanks to tech that will split the 400-volt battery pack in a parallel configuration enabling a 400-kW peak charge rate on an 800-volt charger.

🏎 The first GMA T.50s Niki Lauda supercar debuted, and it’s a stunner.

🚕 Waymo recalled nearly 4,000 self-driving robotaxis to stop them from driving into highway construction zones.

🚖 Uber plans to bring its premium robotaxi service to Houston, Texas in 2027.

Got a tip? Send us a line at tips@thedrive.com


Source link

]]>
2025 Mazda MX-5 Miata 35th Anniversary And RF Hardtop Reviewed https://engineicon.com/2025-mazda-mx-5-miata-35th-anniversary-and-rf-hardtop-reviewed/ Thu, 18 Jun 2026 02:19:40 +0000 https://engineicon.com/2025-mazda-mx-5-miata-35th-anniversary-and-rf-hardtop-reviewed/ Published:  November 13th, 2025

Share

Source link

]]>
Mazda Had A Luce Long Before Ferrari, And It Wants Everyone To Know https://engineicon.com/mazda-had-a-luce-long-before-ferrari-and-it-wants-everyone-to-know/ Sun, 31 May 2026 08:34:59 +0000 https://engineicon.com/mazda-had-a-luce-long-before-ferrari-and-it-wants-everyone-to-know/

Mazda VS. Ferrari

In case you missed the news, Mazda and Ferrari are locked in a trademark battle right now. It’s over the use of the name Luce, which Mazda had used first. However, Ferrari claims to own the rights to that nameplate worldwide, but the folks from Hiroshima aren’t giving up without a fight. Mazda still has a claim over Luce in Japan, meaning Ferrari will have to change the name of its EV if Mazda chooses not to budge. So far, it’s looking that way.

Following the reveal of the Italian Luce, the builders of the Japanese Luce have been doubling down on the trolling efforts. Recently, Mazda showed a photo of its first executive sedan on its socials with the caption “Did anyone say Luce?” On top of that, the company published a short comic highlighting its connection to Italian design. So far, Ferrari hasn’t made any rebuttals as it’s still busy defending itself.

View this post on Instagram

The Car That Started It

The Luce was Mazda’s first foray into the executive car market. It then served as the company’s flagship model from 1966 to 1991. Five generations of the car were made over 25 years. Today, the model holds a special place in Mazda’s history, as it laid the foundation and set the direction of the company, never wavering in its focus on being seen as an innovative and daring automaker.

America did get the Luce, but it came under a different name. It was simply called the 1800, sold in extremely limited numbers, and rarer than hen’s teeth these days. It’s a shame that only a few made it stateside, but then again, it was the ’60s, and the war was still relatively fresh on everyone’s minds. Later export versions of the Luce were called 929.

Mazda

The Mazda-Italy Connection

Mazda’s claim of being inspired by Italian design wasn’t just marketing fluff. It all started in 1960 when Hieyuki Miyakawa and Marisa Bassano crossed paths at the Turin Motor Show. Miyakawa and Bassano, who would later marry, effectively held the key to collaboration between Bertone and Mazda on new designs. The two people they brought together? Tsuneji Matsuda, the president of Mazda at the time, and Giorgetto Giugiaro, a young designer working for Bertone at the time.

The result? Two cars that fused Japanese and Italian design philosophies. The first was the Familia of 1963, and three years later, the Luce in 1966. Giugiaro wasn’t done yet, though, as he followed it up with the Luce Rotary Coupe in 1969. While not penned by the Italian designer, we can see European influences on models such as the Carol kei car and the Cosmo sports coupe.

Mazda

Design Analysis

At first glance, you’d be forgiven for thinking the Luce sedan came from Fiat, Alfa Romeo, or Lancia. The lights and grille are housed in a single shroud, while the long hood lends it a more serious presence. Its tall glasshouse is reminiscent of Italian sedans from the ’60s, while the kink in the rear window is a page out of a certain German automaker based in Munich. At the rear, a simple set of taillights adorns its fascia, and that wraparound windshield is something bean counters would immediately reject today. There was even a wagon version that looked just as good as the sedan.

But it was the Rotary Coupe that looked fantastic. In stark contrast to the sedan, it was lower and sleeker, sharing very little with its more practical sibling. The pillarless doors gave an uninterrupted view out the sides, and all in all, whispered elegance. We’ll admit that we see some shades of the Lancia 2000 Coupe and the Beta Coupe in the two-door Luce, but here’s the thing: The Mazda came first. It’s clean, simple, and unadorned with trinkets that take attention away from its overall design. In other words, it’s the exact opposite of the Ferrari Luce.

Mazda

Mazda


View the 9 images of this gallery on the
original article



Source link

]]>
Mazda CX-5 vs. Mazda CX-50: Comparing the Compact-SUV Siblings https://engineicon.com/mazda-cx-5-vs-mazda-cx-50-comparing-the-compact-suv-siblings/ Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:20:32 +0000 https://engineicon.com/mazda-cx-5-vs-mazda-cx-50-comparing-the-compact-suv-siblings/

Mazda sells two SUVs in the compact-SUV segment: the CX-5 and the CX-50. It’s not the only automaker to have two models competing in the same class—Jeep does the same with the Compass and Cherokee, for instance—but you may wonder why both Mazda crossovers exist when there’s so much overlap in terms of the two models’ sizes, prices, and capabilities. We’re here to shine a light on the similarities and differences between the two when it comes to features, performance, design, and specifications.

It’s important to note that you can’t really go wrong with either of these Mazda SUVs. They both sit near the top of our compact-SUV rankings, have won Car and Driver comparison tests, and have been among our Editors’ Choice picks. Choosing between the two mostly comes down to personal preferences, as they look different inside and out but otherwise feel similar from behind the wheel.

Want to see how these models stack up side-by-side? Compare cars with our new vehicle comparison tool.

Passenger and Cargo Space

The CX-5 and CX-50 are both compact SUVs, meaning they are similarly sized, but there are differences in their proportions and interior dimensions. The CX-50 is lower, wider, and slightly longer overall, meaning it casts a sleeker profile than the more upright CX-5. The redesigned 2026 CX-5 has been stretched, though, meaning it now has the same wheelbase as the CX-50. On the inside, this results in slight differences in passenger room: The CX-5 has a bit more passenger space and more headroom for both front and rear passengers. In our cargo-space testing, we were able to fit nine carry-on suitcases behind the rear seats of the CX-50, but we haven’t yet tested the new CX-5 to see how many cases it holds. Both models have split-folding rear seats that expand the cargo area should you need to carry larger items.

Technology and Infotainment

Mazda has made a major change to its infotainment system in the 2026 CX-5, meaning it has a completely different interface than what you’ll find in the CX-50. The new CX-5 has a significantly larger touchscreen infotainment system that integrates many controls that were previously hard buttons and knobs. The lower trims have a 12.9-inch touchscreen, while the higher trims have a 15.6-inch touchscreen.

2026 mazda cx5
2026 mazda cx50 meridian edition

Michael Simari|Car and Driver

CX-50

The CX-50, meanwhile, continues with the older Mazda infotainment setup, which uses a control knob on the console to operate the 8.8-inch screen, though a touchscreen function is available when you’re using smartphone-mirroring functions.

Engines, Transmissions, and Towing

The CX-50 and CX-5 offer the same gas engine as standard, but the major difference is that the CX-50 has two other available powertrains. The base engine for the CX-5 and CX-50 is a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter four-cylinder with 187 horsepower, while the CX-50 also offers an optional, more powerful engine: a turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four with 256 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque (these numbers apply if you use premium fuel; Mazda quotes slightly lower power and torque figures on regular fuel). There’s also a CX-50 Hybrid, which has a powertrain borrowed from the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid, features a 2.5-liter gas engine and three electric motors for a total output of 219 horsepower. Mazda plans to add CX-5 Hybrid to the lineup in the near future, but we don’t yet have details on that powertrain.

In our testing, the naturally aspirated CX-50 got to 60 mph in 8.4 seconds, while the turbocharged version took 6.4 seconds. The CX-50 Hybrid with its 7.6 second result splits the difference between the base-engine CX-5 and the turbos. We haven’t yet tested the new 2026 CX-5.

The CX-50 is the vehicle to choose if you want to tow. It has a maximum towing capacity of 3500 pounds with the turbo engine, while the naturally aspirated model is rated to tow 2000 pounds. The Hybrid is good for just 1500 pounds, and the CX-5 is also rated for 1500 pounds.

Fuel Economy

EPA gas-mileage ratings for the CX-5 and CX-50 are nearly identical, with the base-engine versions of both rated at 26 mpg combined. Opting for the turbocharged engine drops the combined rating to 25 mpg for the CX-50. The CX-50 Hybrid is rated far higher, at 38 mpg combined. In our real-world 75-mph highway fuel economy test, the CX-50 Hybrid earned a result of 34 mpg, while the turbocharged CX-50 achieved 29 mpg.

Off-Road Capabilities

Neither of these Mazda SUVs are pitched as hardcore off-roaders, but the CX-50 has a bit more trail cred than the CX-5 does. The CX-50 has 8.3 inches of ground clearance to the CX-5’s 7.6 inches, meaning you’re less likely to scrape the bottom of the CX-50 if you take it on more challenging terrain. The CX-50 also offers a more rugged-looking trim level, the Meridian Edition, that comes with all-terrain tires and other accessories that make it look more adventurous than the standard models.

mazda cx5 vs cx50

Joey Capparella|Car and Driver

CX-50 Turbo Meridian Edition with Apex Package

Pricing and Trim Levels

The CX-50 has a lower base price than the CX-5, but only slightly. Otherwise, the pricing is similar, except that the CX-50 offers more trim levels. The CX-50 also has a hybrid version that commands a price premium over the nonhybrid.

Prices for the 2026 Mazda CX-5:

  • 2.5 S: $31,485
  • Select: $33,485
  • Preferred: $35,745
  • Premium: $38,395
  • Premium Plus: $40,485

Prices for the 2026 Mazda CX-50:

  • 2.5 S Select: $31,395
  • 2.5 S Preferred: $33,895
  • 2.5 S Meridian Edition: $35,240
  • 2.5 S Premium: $36,395
  • 2.5 Turbo: $39,395
  • 2.5 S Premium Plus: $38,920
  • 2.5 Turbo Meridian Edition: $42,490
  • 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus: $44,395

Prices for the 2026 Mazda CX-50 Hybrid:

  • Preferred: $36,840
  • Premium: $40,240
  • Premium Plus: $42,540
Headshot of Joey Capparella

Despite being raised on a steady diet of base-model Hondas and Toyotas—or perhaps because of it—Joey Capparella cultivated an obsession for the automotive industry throughout his childhood in Nashville, Tennessee. He found a way to write about cars for the school newspaper during his college years at Rice University, which eventually led him to move to Ann Arbor, Michigan, for his first professional auto-writing gig at Automobile Magazine. He has been part of the Hearst Autos team since 2016 and now lives in New York City.  

Source link

]]> Mazda updates NVES position | GoAuto https://engineicon.com/mazda-updates-nves-position-goauto/ Mon, 23 Mar 2026 01:24:51 +0000 https://engineicon.com/mazda-updates-nves-position-goauto/

HAVING amassed the largest liabilities of all 70 car-makers in the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard Regulator’s first report Mazda Australia has described NVES as a “secondary” consideration as it introduces a new version of its best-selling vehicle in petrol all-wheel-drive format only. 

 

With battery electric vehicles still months away from joining Mazda Australia’s portfolio, the Japanese importer is reliant on the sales performance of its limited mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid offerings to balance its internal combustion volume, placing it in an unenviable position against rivals. 

 

However, local Mazda leadership says passing on NVES penalties to customers “will be the last option we take”. 

 

Speaking with GoAuto at a static local debut of the next-generation CX-5 and new CX-6e battery electric SUV, Mazda Australia managing director Vinesh Bhindi the brand is “driven by what the customer wants, and what the customer is expecting from us, and that is our priority”. 

 

Framing NVES as “secondary”, Mr Bhindi said the impact of legislation “is something that happens behind the scenes”. 

 

“We have to work in that environment, and so does every other brand. The end result of all of that is just the cost of doing business in Australia. 

 

“Our priority is to meet consumer needs, wants, and demands. So, that’s the way we look at it.” 

 

While standing firm on his point, Mr Bhindi said Mazda would continue to adjust its model mix as NVES regulations tightened, ensuring it would mitigate the cost of any penalties being forwarded to its customers. 

 

“We are realistic. We know that building a car, manufacturing a car, assembling a car, and shipping a car all takes time – and we need it to be right,” he explained. 

 

“There are three things that, when it comes to NVES, we need to look at. 

 

“The first and foremost is to offer products and technologies that there is a market for and that customer wants, but that as a side benefit can get us credits to maximise our NVES position. 

 

“Secondly, the legislators have created an arena where car brands have to do a bit of horse trading on credits … and there will be very cheap credits available at a point in time. 

 

“And from our point of view, the last thing is the passing on of that cost. If you can balance the cost of doing business with the levers you have at your disposal, then you don’t have to worry about that last piece (passing on costs to customers). 

 

“But if it does happen, then that will be the last option we take.” 

 

Mr Bhindi pointed to the fact that Australia battery electric vehicle take-up remains relatively low, suggesting the model mix Mazda will offer locally between now and the end of the decade will work to complement NVES demands, meaning little (if any) additional costs will be passed on to Mazda customers. 

 

“Our thinking is, let’s first get the products that help us keep the price points and value of our technologies reasonable for our customers,” he added. 

 

“The battery electric market is under 10 per cent of the market at the moment, and while we know it will grow, we don’t know how quickly it will grow. 

 

“If there are very cheap credits available, and those credits help consumers (to afford familiar powertrain offerings) then it will help us maintain prices within a reasonable zone. 

 

“NVES is designed so that consumers can still get the car they need, and the car they want. Not everybody will buy a battery-electric (vehicle), and not everybody in the future will buy ICE. 

 

“So, let’s fix the option that helps consumers first, and let the cost of doing business find its level.” 

 

In the meantime, Mazda is turning to China so it can introduce two BEVs this year – the 6e sedan and CX-6e SUV – while a petrol-electric hybrid CX-5 will not arrive until late 2027. 

 

It already offers mild hybrid and plug-in hybrid offerings as part of its Large Product Group line-up (CX-60, CX-70, CX-80, and CX-90), alongside petrol- and diesel-powered models. 

 

Mr Bhindi said that should consumer demand for more electrified offerings intensify more rapidly than anticipated, it had the option to lean on alliance partners like Changan Automobile (which currently makes the 6e and CX-6e for Mazda) in delivering other alternatives for the Australian market. 

 

“Provided there is demand, that is a lever we can pull,” Mr Bhindi told GoAuto. 

 

“If customers in Australia are comfortable with a car in terms of their budgets, then I think the 6e and CX-6e will suit most buyers’ needs. 

 

“Where we expand beyond there – whether smaller, cheaper, bigger, more expensive, all of those options – are options that consumer feedback will dictate. Only then will we pull the lever.” 

 

Mazda Motor Corporation general manager of global sales and marketing Manabu Osuga said customer input will be critical in deciding which – if any – electric model will be introduced next. 

 

“We have such a great partnership with Changan (Automobile) and the thing we are discussing with this partner is how we can evolve the Chinese market while at the same time best utilising our 200,000 unit per annum production capacity we have in China,” he said. 

 

“The Mazda 6e and Mazda CX-6e are the first two products we are providing outside of China. Once we gain consumer feedback (on these models) from the global market, then we can use that voice of customer to consider other models. 

 

“So, at this moment, I really don’t know what type of car we will produce next.” 

 

Mr Osuga said that should interest in the Mazda 6e and CX-6e – or any future electric vehicle built in collaboration with Changan Automobile – prove successful, Mazda Motor Corporation had the option to increase annual outputs beyond the current 200,000-unit limit. 

 

“While I must remain sensitive about our production capacity … our desire is to exceed demand over supply,” he added. 

 

“We want to be an admired brand, and if the customer asks for more, then we can of course consider it. But at the moment, of course, it is too soon to make such a decision.”

Source link

]]>
2020 Mazda CX-30 makes room in small crossover SUV lineup https://engineicon.com/2020-mazda-cx-30-makes-room-in-small-crossover-suv-lineup/ Wed, 21 Jan 2026 05:01:41 +0000 https://engineicon.com/2020-mazda-cx-30-makes-room-in-small-crossover-suv-lineup/

The 2020 Mazda CX-30 that arrived in the U.S. on Wednesday at the 2019 Los Angeles Auto Show raises big questions about small crossovers in the Mazda lineup. It would seem as if the larger CX-30 would replace the CX-3 subcompact crossover, but instead it slots between the CX-3 and CX-5, Mazda spokesman Drew Carey told us on the show floor.

The new model is similar to the CX-4 sold in China.  

Based on the redesigned Mazda3 compact sedan and hatch, the 2020 Mazda CX-30 has more interior space and cargo volume than the cramped CX-3, which is smaller than the Mazda3 hatchback. Mazda says the CX-30 blends coupe-like style with crossover-like proportions, but it looks like any other small Mazda crossover. The grille is lower and stretched into the LEDs, and the CX-30 gets a mesh insert instead of slats. It looks more like a smile than the opened-mouth laugh on the CX-3. Because it’s larger, the black cladding down the sides and over the wheel arches is more balanced and proportional than on the smaller space of the CX-3, and 16-inch aluminum alloy wheels are standard. 

The most significant difference is at the rear. The rear window is more integrated into the body design and the arched liftgate gives it a rounded form that also helps the function. It’s only five inches longer than the CX-3, and about an inch wider and taller, but has nearly double the cargo volume at 20.2 cubic feet (12.4 cu.ft. in the CX-3), same as the Mazda3 hatchback.

Even though the CX-30 is as wide as the Mazda3, it rides five inches taller for that higher seat position coveted by crossover shoppers. That, along with narrower pillars, should improve front and rear outward vision, which is a big complaint in the CX-3. Other interior improvements in space include a slanted rear footwell for a better fit for rear seat passengers. 

The interior design in the CX-30 is consistent with other Mazda vehicles. An 8.8-inch display screen embedded in the dash is controlled by a dial in the console. The horizontal line of vents and narrow band of climate controls create a clean, spartan look that matches Mazda’s move into more upscale refinement.

Standard features across the base CX-30 Select, Preferred, and Premium trims include Mazda Connected Services through a smartphone app, which enables remote start as well as vehicle service and status updates. Wi-fi is included for a six-month trial, and two USB ports come standard. 

The 2020 CX-30 ($22,945 including $1,045 destination) comes with Mazda’s active safety tech that includes automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, active lane control, and high-beam assist.

Select trim ($24,945) includes Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility, blind-spot monitors, rear cross-traffic alert, keyless entry, synthetic leather seats, leather steering wheel and shift knob, as well as 18-inch alloy wheels.

Preferred trim ($27,245) gets the CX-30 a-rockin with a Bose 12-speaker system, heated front seats, and eight-way power driver’s seat. At the top of the line, Premium ($29,245) includes leather seats, head-up display, adaptive lights, power tailgate, moonroof, adaptive lights, cylinder deactivation to conserve fuel and more.  

The front-wheel drive crossover is powered by a 186-hp 2.5-liter inline-4 with six-speed automatic. All-wheel drive is a $1,400 upcharge on all models. The 2020 CX-30 is on sale now.



Source link

]]>