U.S – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com Latest car news and advice blog Tue, 14 Jul 2026 02:07:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1 https://engineicon.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/cropped-ME_favicon-1-32x32.png U.S – Engine Icon https://engineicon.com 32 32 Megawatt EV Chargers Have Landed In The U.S., But There’s A Problem https://engineicon.com/megawatt-ev-chargers-have-landed-in-the-u-s-but-theres-a-problem/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 01:43:07 +0000 https://engineicon.com/megawatt-ev-chargers-have-landed-in-the-u-s-but-theres-a-problem/

  • Alpitronic’s new megawatt chargers are sleek and efficient.
  • They’re currently being tested at the company’s North Carolina headquarters.
  • Megwatt chargers are way faster than existing stations, with some charging batteries from 10-80% in 7 minutes or less.

Italian charging hardware provider Alpitronic is testing its new HYC1000 megawatt chargers at its North American headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina, the company confirmed today. The chargers can deliver up to 1,000 kilowatts of power to a single port for semi trucks, and up to 600 kW for passenger EVs. That’s way beyond what the fastest-charging EVs in the U.S. can currently accept. 

Still, the technology could usher in a new era of ultra-fast charging in North America and encourage automakers to roll out newer EVs capable of charging at higher rates. Charging is one of the bottlenecks in mass adoption of EVs, but such high power systems can make it as seamless as refueling a gas car.

In a recent video from the Out Of Spec Reviews YouTube channel, Alpitronic Americas President Mike Doucleff explained how exactly the HYC1000 chargers work, what’s different from other large charging networks, and how EV drivers will benefit from the tech.

For starters, Alpitronic is one of the fastest-growing charging hardware providers in the U.S. In just a couple of years, it has inked deals with several leading charging networks like Ionna, Walmart, Mercedes-Benz High Power Charging, Electrify America, and BP Pulse. Those networks have already deployed hundreds of Alpitronic HYC400 chargers nationwide and continue to do so at a rapid clip. 

The newer HYC1000 charger takes things further. The megawatt dispensers are slim and tall rectangular units, with each capable of holding two cables. They support the Tesla-style NACS cables, CCS cables and the Megawatt Charging Standard (MCS) cable for heavy duty trucks; they can be configured with either of these combinations depending on the network provider’s needs. They also have swinging arms at the top that carry the cable weight, a vehicle-facing touchscreen to display charging details, and a card reader.



Each tower has two plugs, both of which can simultaneously deliver up to 600 amps and a 1,000 volts, which translates to 600 kW of power. The fastest chargers in the U.S., like the Tesla V4 Superchargers and the Gravity Charging Center in New York City, top out at 500 kW. No EVs in the U.S. can accept that sort of power at the moment. The Porsche Cayenne Electric, BMW iX3, and Lucid Gravity all top out at about 400 kW. 




Alpitronic HYC1000 Charging

Photo by: Alpitronic

The modularity of these chargers is also impressive, at least on paper. The chargers can be configured to deliver 1,500 amps and 1,000 volts with the MCS standard. So one location could have semi trucks and passenger EVs charging at the same time, depending on how the site is designed and the combination of available plugs. The company also worked with Mercedes-AMG to develop a special version of the HYC1000 capable of delivering 1,000 kW to a passenger EV. The Concept AMG GT XX peaked at 1,041 kilowatts during a test run in Italy last year. 

Furthermore, the dispensers’ distributed power delivery is fascinating. The main cabinet consists of eight 125 kW silicon carbide power modules, capable of powering eight individual charging towers. Each of these 125 kW modules in the cabinet is further subdivided into 62.5 kW units for a more precise distribution of power depending on the demand at each stall. 




Alpitronic HYC1000 Distributed Megawatt Charging

Alpitronic HYC1000 Distributed Megawatt Charging

Photo by: Alpitronic

For example, if a Chevy Equinox EV that peaks at 150 kW and a Hyundai Ioniq 5, which can charge at up to 350 kW, are parked adjacent, the charger can deliver those speeds precisely. It can match that demand without wasting a single tower’s maximum capability on a car that can’t use it. Moreover, EVs usually need their full charging power at a low state of charge, which then tapers off to slower speeds as charging progresses, which makes such smart power management even more beneficial. 

To be fair, Alpitronic isn’t the only one doing this dynamic load balancing. Tesla, ChargePoint, and Electrify America have all adopted similar approaches.

That said, megawatt charging is already getting democratized in China on mass market models from BYD and Geely. Plus, Alpitronic isn’t the only company rolling out megawatt chargers in the U.S. Tesla has started rolling out its Megachargers for the Semi, and Kempower is planning to do the same for electric semi trucks.

However, it’s starting to look like this tech could also someday trickle down to passengers EVs in the U.S., which would be a big win for EV adoption.

Contact the author: suvrat.kothari@insideevs.com

Source link

]]>
Tesla Full Self-Driving Faces New U.S. Probe Following Crashes and Fatal Incident https://engineicon.com/tesla-full-self-driving-faces-new-u-s-probe-following-crashes-and-fatal-incident/ Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:53:20 +0000 https://engineicon.com/tesla-full-self-driving-faces-new-u-s-probe-following-crashes-and-fatal-incident/

The federal government is not impressed with Tesla. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) is further probing Tesla’s Full Self Driving Beta and Full Self Driving (Supervised) degradation detection system, which was deployed after the automaker began moving away from using both cameras and radars to just cameras with its Tesla Vision system in mid-2021. The agency is concerned that, despite an update, it “fails to detect and/or warn the driver appropriately under degraded visibility conditions such as glare and airborne obcurants.”

In other words, the camera-only semi-autonomous driving aid could be compromised in certain conditions, and it may not warn the driver of its shortcomings soon enough to avoid a crash. There are also concerns of under-reporting related crashes, and at least one has been fatal. Let’s dig deeper.

What the NHTSA is Investigating at Tesla

@mikepat711 / X.com

The NHTSA says that Tesla began developing a software update to the degradation detection system the day after submitting a report of a fatal crash on November 28, 2023, but the ODI “does not have information on when the update was deployed and which vehicles have the updated system.” However, it is aware of at least nine incidents of crashes, and if the software was deployed to these vehicles, it may have affected a third of those crashes. During the preliminary evaluation phase, Tesla said that internal data and labeling limitations prevented a uniform identification and analysis of crashes with the potentially problematic system engaged, and because it hasn’t been able to correctly determine which crashes involved the software, this may have led to under-reporting of crashes at various times during the defined period. Thus, the preliminary evaluation has now been graduated to an engineering analysis. The following 43 products equipped with FSD are named in the NHTSA investigation:

  • 2016-2026 Tesla Model S
  • 2016-2026 Tesla Model X
  • 2017-2026 Tesla Model 3
  • 2020-2026 Tesla Model Y
  • 2023-2026 Tesla Cybertruck

The NHTSA’s incident data may suggest that Tesla’s degradation detection system (both the original software and the update) fails to detect and/or warn the driver appropriately when visibility is compromised. The crashes that the ODI reviewed showed that the system failed to detect common conditions that impaired camera visibility and/or provide alerts warning that camera performance had deteriorated “until immediately before the crash occurred,” and Tesla’s responses to NHTSA inquiries found that additional crashes occurred in similar environments. The NHTSA adds that “FSD also lost track of or never detected a lead vehicle in its path.”

What’s Next for Tesla FSD

Mark Leong/The Washington Post/Getty Images

PE24031 is now upgraded to an engineering analysis, which will allow the ODI to gather more info on Tesla’s updated degradation detection system and to determine how far along Tesla got in deploying the new software. It will also seek to determine the scope of compatible vehicles and how effective the system actually is in detecting impairments and warning drivers thereof. Then, the ODI will analyze six potentially related incidents (SGO reports 13781-11937, 13781-13211, 13781-13569, 13781-13633, 13781-13693, 13781-13788). With vehicles nearly flying off overpasses on FSD and Senators deeply concerned about how the system deals with rail crossings, Tesla needs to develop a real fix soon. Or go back to radars, though we doubt it’s willing to incur the expense.

Source link

]]>
U.S. Officials Blast Canada’s Cheap Chinese EV Deal https://engineicon.com/u-s-officials-blast-canadas-cheap-chinese-ev-deal/ Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:56:59 +0000 https://engineicon.com/u-s-officials-blast-canadas-cheap-chinese-ev-deal/

China’s advanced auto industry may be hitting some speed bumps at home, but it’s expanding overseas at warp speed. And lately it’s been a question of “when,” not “if,” those vehicles could ever come to the United States.

2026 already feels like some dominoes have begun to fall. You had the Geely Group’s strong showing at CES (and hints that a U.S. debut announcement could come in the next few years), President Donald Trump’s repeated openness to Chinese automakers setting up factories in the U.S., and now, a trade deal between Canada and China that will lower tariff barriers to Chinese EVs in America’s neighbor to the north. So where do things go from here?

The must-read morning roundup of EV and tech news.

Welcome back to Critical Materials, our morning roundup of auto industry and technology news. We’ll be diving more into the China trade deal today, along with why it’s good news for Tesla, and why this debate is caught up in the ongoing affordability crisis. Let’s dig in. 

25%: Canada’s EV Tariff Deal With China Puts The U.S., Auto Industry On Alert




Geely and Zeekr at CES 2026

Geely and Zeekr at CES 2026

Photo by: Patrick George

As we reported on Friday, the China-Canada deal is small for now—it’s capped at 49,000 cars for its first year, with expansion to 70,000 within five years. But it’s a start (or rather a restart, since it returns Canada to its pre-2023 tariff deal) to something potentially big: the growing expansion of Chinese EVs into North America. And as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney explicitly said, most of these imports will cost under $25,000 U.S. (about $35,000 CAD).

Naturally, not everyone is happy about what could be a threat to automotive jobs in North America. Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, blamed the Trump administration’s strained relations with Canada, reports The Hill:

“We just got absolutely rolled in this Canada – China deal. A stark foreign policy failure with domestic economic consequences,” Schatz wrote in a post on social platform X. 

“The most basic principle in politics and geopolitics is loyalty to friends. And we weren’t just disloyal – we were hostile. So here we are,” he added.

President Donald Trump, for his part, appeared to give the deal a thumbs-up: “If you can get a deal with China, you should do that,” Trump told reporters. Other U.S. economic officials said Canada will ultimately regret the deal.

My colleague Kevin Williams has a good story about what’s at stake, and why leaders in the auto-producing parts of Canada are especially unhappy about the deal. And it brings plenty of concern among U.S. auto industry observers as well. From the Associated Press:

Chinese automakers will have to meet standards required for the Canadian auto market for the latest trade arrangement to be successful—standards that are similar to those in the U.S.—which is likely to incentivize Chinese auto manufacturing investment in Canada.

They’ll also have to establish which segment of the market they are targeting there: Higher-end vehicles, or less-expensive ones that sell at higher volumes.

Regardless, “It brings it home to what is needed to compete globally,” said Mark Wakefield, global automotive market lead at AlixPartners. The firm predicts Chinese brands will account for 30% of the global market by 2030.

“They’ve already started in Europe. They started in South America. Now Mexico and Canada,” Wakefield said. American carmakers “don’t want to end up as a Brazil with your ethanol-based cars that aren’t sellable anywhere else in the world and … like Britain or Australia that used to matter in the auto world, and no longer really matter.”

Emphasis mine above, because that is indeed a scary outcome for the U.S. auto industry.

Then again, if it brings more affordable hybrid and zero-emission options to North America—and the way things are potentially going, the U.S. included—and is that such a bad thing? Ultimately, North Americans will have to make a choice: affordability or loyalty to local production.

Unless, of course, our automakers can meet people halfway and get that $50,000 average new car price down considerably.

50%: The Canada-China Trade Deal Is Good News For Tesla




2026 Tesla Model 3 Standard

2026 Tesla Model 3 Standard

Photo by: Tesla

Tesla had a bad year in Canada in 2025, with sales dropping nearly 64% amid the U.S. trade war and CEO Elon Musk’s multiple controversies. But the China trade deal could be good news for the electric automaker: it builds a ton of cars in China, including ones it exports to Canada (unlike the U.S.)
And now, those just got a whole lot cheaper, potentially. Here’s Reuters with more:

While many Chinese automakers will be keen to seize the opportunity as they expand exports, Tesla has an advantage as it in 2023 already equipped its Shanghai plant, its biggest and most cost-efficient factory globally, to build and export a Canada-specific version of its Model Y.

The U.S. automaker had that same year started shipping the car from Shanghai to Canada, boosting Canadian imports of automobiles from China to its largest port, Vancouver, by 460% year over year to 44,356 in 2023.

But it was forced to stop in 2024 and switched to shipping from its U.S. and Berlin factories after Ottawa imposed 100% tariffs, citing a wish to counter what they called China’s intentional state-directed policy of overcapacity.

“This new agreement could allow resumption of those exports rather quickly,” said Sam Fiorani, vice president of research firm AutoForecast Solutions.

Now, to see if Canadians actually line up to buy those cars.

75%: Affordability Anxiety Will Define 2026’s Car Market




2027 Chevrolet Bolt

Photo by: Patrick George

But all of this, I’d argue, isn’t even a technology issue or a geopolitical one: it’s an affordability issue. The appeal of Chinese imports is that they’re good and they’re cheap—a combination that feels in short supply in the North American car market.

According to Automotive News, affordability anxiety was the overwhelming vibe at the 2026 Detroit Auto Show. And while carmakers may breathe a sigh of relief that they’re no longer under a regulatory gun to make tons of EVs now that fuel economy requirements have been eased, they can’t lean on super-expensive gas trucks to save the day like they used to:

“What’s holding the market back is certainly affordability and really the lack of low-priced vehicles,” said Michael Robinet, executive director of automotive consulting at S&P Global Mobility. “Not only in the United States, but around the world, this is a problem.”

Sen. Bernie Moreno, a former car dealer and member of the committee working to reschedule testimony from the Detroit 3 CEOs, said the Trump administration is easing regulations to help bring down vehicle costs and that automakers also have a role to play. The government is rolling back emissions standards and in September eliminated a $7,500 tax credit that had greatly fueled EV demand.

It now takes about 36 weeks of median income to buy an average new vehicle, according to Cox Automotive data. That’s down from 42 weeks three years ago but not necessarily a sign affordability has significantly improved, Cox Executive Analyst Erin Keating said.

“Even with affordable vehicles out there, fewer buyers are buying. The consensus is that this shift isn’t temporary. … That’s one reason dealer sentiment reflects concern. The missing customers aren’t sidelined. They’re essentially excluded.”

So how do they plan to meet the moment? According to that story, Jeep and Ram parent company Stellantis is preparing more models priced under $40,000 and even $30,000 (though I’ll believe the latter when I see it) and even Ford said it might consider making sedans again after canceling all of them in 2020.

One bright spot for EV fans: the falling costs of batteries should make electric power more affordable. But clearly, the demand is there for new cars that won’t break the bank. And if the familiar automakers won’t deliver, it seems China Inc. is ready to.

100%: How Much Does It Matter To You Where Your Car Is Made?




Zeekr 9x

Photo by: Zeekr

I have owned Toyotas made in the United States, a Chevrolet and a Mazda made in Mexico, and a Kia made in South Korea (that’s now made in Georgia instead), among other things. I can’t say that production origin means all that much to me in a globalized world.

So is that a priority for you when you buy a car? Sound off in the comments. 

Contact the author: patrick.george@insideevs.com

Source link

]]>
Car Prices Hit $50,000. Now the U.S. Wants to Ease Emissions Rules https://engineicon.com/car-prices-hit-50000-now-the-u-s-wants-to-ease-emissions-rules/ Mon, 19 Jan 2026 04:02:31 +0000 https://engineicon.com/car-prices-hit-50000-now-the-u-s-wants-to-ease-emissions-rules/

The Solution to Rising Car Prices

A report from Reuters says the Trump administration’s top auto policy officials are seeking to lower vehicle prices by scaling back emissions regulations. This aligns with the fact that average new car prices surpassed $50,000 in December 2025.

Despite what some view as opposition to electrified vehicles, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the market should not depend on “government policy to encourage EV purchases while penalizing combustion engines.” That regulatory tilt was evident in recent automaker product strategies, with Dodge – a brand long associated with muscle cars – going so far as to discontinue the gas-powered Charger as the nameplate transitioned to a new generation initially led by an all-electric version.

Cole Attisha

The Policy Winds Change Direction

At the same time, combustion-powered vehicles appear to be regaining momentum, highlighted by the return of models such as the 777-horsepower Ram 1500 TRX. The shift follows policy changes under the current administration, including the elimination of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit and the removal of penalties tied to fuel-efficiency requirements. Even California – long viewed as a leader in EV adoption – saw its plan to phase out new gasoline-powered vehicle sales by 2035 rescinded.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head Lee Zeldin reiterated that view, arguing the government “should not be forcing, requiring, mandating that the market go in a direction other than what the American consumer is demanding.”

So how can easing emissions regulations affect car prices? One factor is that automakers must invest in additional hardware to meet emissions rules and avoid penalties. This often includes electrified components such as electric motors that form part of hybrid systems. While these technologies improve fuel efficiency and performance – by operating in parallel or in series with an engine, as seen in Nissan’s e-Power system – they also add complexity and cost to vehicles.

Nissan

The Market’s Verdict So Far

The shift in EV policy may have weighed on brands such as Tesla, but overall U.S. new-vehicle sales still reportedly rose 2.4% in 2025 to 16.2 million units. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer added that the removal of EV incentives and the introduction of new tariffs are “not really getting down to the consumer,” suggesting that lower vehicle prices could still materialize.

The report also noted that the EPA is expected to finalize a rule in the coming weeks that would remove federal tailpipe emissions mandates.

Ford


View the 3 images of this gallery on the
original article

Source link

]]>